Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Glover v. Vail Corporation, 97-1100 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 97-1100 Visitors: 27
Filed: Apr. 13, 1998
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 137 F.3d 1444 Michelle GLOVER, a natural person and citizen of the United Kingdom, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VAIL CORPORATION, doing business as Vail Associates, Inc., a Colorado corporation; Vail Associates, Inc., a Colorado corporation; Vail Associates Holdings, Ltd., a Colorado corporation; Vail Holdings, Inc., a Colorado corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 97-1100. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. April 13, 1998. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District Of
More

137 F.3d 1444

Michelle GLOVER, a natural person and citizen of the United
Kingdom, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VAIL CORPORATION, doing business as Vail Associates, Inc., a
Colorado corporation; Vail Associates, Inc., a Colorado
corporation; Vail Associates Holdings, Ltd., a Colorado
corporation; Vail Holdings, Inc., a Colorado corporation,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 97-1100.

United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.

April 13, 1998.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District Of Colorado (D.Ct. No. 96-B-394).

Michael J. Roche (John B. Moorhead with him on briefs), of Baker & Hostetler, LLP, Denver, CO, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

David H. Yun (Stephen Hopkins with him on brief), of Long & Jaudon, P.C., Denver, CO, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before TACHA, McKAY, and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

1

We AFFIRM the holding of the district court for substantially the same reasons discussed by the district court in its published opinion. See Glover v. Vail Corp., 955 F. Supp. 105 (D.Colo.1997).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer